Maryland enacts Voting Rights Act to enable challenges to local election systems
Maryland has enacted a state-level Voting Rights Act aimed at local elections, giving the state attorney general and private plaintiffs new authority to challenge county and municipal election systems that dilute the voting strength of protected groups.
Gov. Wes Moore signed Senate Bill 255, “Voting Rights Act of 2026 – Counties and Municipal Corporations,” on April 28. The measure was enacted as Chapter 157. Because it was passed as an emergency measure, it took effect immediately upon Moore’s signature.
The new law creates a state process for contesting local election methods for governing bodies if those systems weaken the ability of minority voters to elect candidates they prefer. It does not apply to statewide elections, a key limitation that leaves Maryland’s statewide voting rules unchanged.
The statute, which creates a new Title 15.7 in Maryland’s Election Law article, bars counties and municipalities from imposing or using an election method for a governing body “in a manner that impairs the ability of members of a protected class to elect candidates of the members’ choice” or otherwise dilutes or abridges those voters’ rights. It defines a protected class as voters who are members of a race, color or language minority group.
It also defines “polarized voting,” a central concept in voting-rights cases that examines whether different groups of voters tend to support different candidates. The law directs courts to consider the kinds of evidence and methodologies used in enforcement of the federal Voting Rights Act, tying Maryland’s new state standard to established voting-rights analysis.
Enforcement powers are broad. The Office of the Attorney General and private parties can file suit in the county where an alleged violation occurred. They may seek injunctive relief, damages and other relief, and courts may award reasonable attorney’s fees and costs to a prevailing private plaintiff.
At the same time, the law does not give courts unlimited power to redesign local election systems. The statute limits some remedies, including by restricting courts from imposing certain election methods that are inconsistent with methods already used in counties unless the local jurisdiction agrees.
The measure arrived after the Maryland General Assembly’s 2026 regular session adjourned on April 13. Moore signed election-related legislation in several post-session bill-signing ceremonies between April 14 and May 12, including SB 255. In an April 28 press release, Moore said, “The bills I signed today make life just a little easier for our people.”
SB 255 was the enacted Senate vehicle for the policy; House Bill 350 was its cross-file. It was part of a broader package of election-law changes this year, though state sources do not provide a single official tally for all such measures in the research available. Among the other enactments was House Bill 263, Chapter 106, which addressed rules for early-voting centers.
The law also places Maryland in a broader national trend of states adopting their own voting-rights protections for elections within their borders as federal safeguards have narrowed in recent years through Supreme Court rulings. In Maryland, however, the scope of the new law is specifically local: county and municipal governing-body elections.
Voting-rights advocates praised the measure after it was signed. Common Cause Maryland said, “By enacting the Voting Rights Act of 2026, Maryland is meeting this moment with the urgency it demands, removing barriers to the ballot box, and ensuring every voice in our state is heard.”
Other supporters included the NAACP Legal Defense Fund and the ACLU of Maryland. During debate, some county associations and local officials warned the bill could increase litigation exposure and costs for local governments and raised concerns about local control, according to Maryland Matters.